I tried it with the new firmware and the wrong result does not change.
On December 13, I ran 10.52 km in 55:30 (average 5:16 / km).
On December 27, I ran against race of 13 December and and I ran just only 6.18 km before stopping because I got injured.
However, I took two references, the first after covering 2000
meters and the second at 4000
At a distance of 2000 meters (partial time: 9:52)
clock reported an advantage on the trainer of 140 meters
Instead from the image that clarifies the evolution of the races can we grasp that trainer at the same Partial 9:52 had run for 2,100
km, so Trainer was ahead 100 meters and NOT 140 behind
And yet at a distance of 4000 meters (partial time: 20:50)
the clock reported an advantage on the trainer of 46 meters
While at part-time 20:50, trainer had run for 4.250
km, therefore Trainer was ahead 250 meters and NOT 46 behind
Everything would make sense if the clock merely consider the average speed of the trainer 5:16/km (see in the lower part of the image)
It 's so??